A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among potential neighbours around the development of the wall at a coastal web site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide focus next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier and also the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction functions at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to build their relatives dwelling. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted beneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their preparing permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result spots are subject to strict controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, especially inside a sensitive coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct position. Their authorized team has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, an image that has because turn out to be emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they have been intended to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the water through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the positioning grew to become Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these actions have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected in detail through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court read more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment inside the lawful timeline.
Within the core of your dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as built, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing paperwork, maps, and situations attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to produce a relatives household in accordance Using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Place of Conservation and say that each one will work are already carried out dependant on Skilled advice and permitted ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying points.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about construction of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for your situation that many observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted the businessman experienced previously been involved in community advocacy on planning and environmental troubles, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from pretty distinctive professional backgrounds can find on their own aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-large h2o through a storm Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site to photograph the positioning Irish Moments and René Collier waded by waistline-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily truth on the coastline along with the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result stays uncertain. The court docket ought to determine whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Area of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and preparing conditions. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Stay together with one another extended after the authorized costs are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development works at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase beyond that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. What's more, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when essential difficulties for instance environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre with the dispute stands partly built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter whether it'll finally be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.